ALISTAIR Darling today accuses Alex Salmond of running scared on independence and fends off attacks on his own character in an exclusive interview with The Herald.
With just two days to go before the launch of the cross-party campaign to convince Scots to stay with the Union, the former chancellor says he is convinced Alex Salmond wants a second question on the referendum ballot paper because he is fearful of defeat on independence. Mr Darling says poll after poll shows voters are heavily opposed to it.
"It's obvious to me, to put it bluntly, he wants two questions because he is frightened of one," he says.
Denouncing the idea of a devo-max question on the ballot paper as a "cheap gimmick", Mr Darling argues: "I find it difficult to see how on earth he can put forward with any credibility the proposition for more devolution when he doesn't believe in it."
The No campaign leader denounces the recent SNP attacks against his time at the Treasury, noting: "It's a sign of the Nationalists' weakness that, whenever they are confronted with the merits of what they are proposing, they prefer to attack the individual rather than deal with the question in hand."
However, it is his remarks about the SNP's proposal for an independent Scotland forming part of a currency union with England that have the sharpest edge.
Mr Darling says: "The lunacy of their argument is that to make a common currency work you would have to have all sorts of eurozone-style rules requiring your budget to be approved by the other country, and you end up, as you have seen in Europe, with a common currency that takes you all the way round to economic and then political union. In other words, you go through all the trauma of breaking up the United Kingdom to end up back with it, which is absolutely barmy."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article