Attempts to persuade traditional Labour supporters to vote Yes in the independence referendum have been described as "cynical" by Alistair Darling.
The leader of the Better Together campaign said independence would lead to "austerity plus for decades to come".
Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has urged Labour voters to back independence in order to "reclaim their politics and their party".
Speaking last month, she renewed a plea made previously at the SNP conference in April, and said many Labour supporters were already planning to vote Yes to independence.
In a speech to campaign supporters in Coatbridge today, Mr Darling targeted Alex Salmond - who he will face in a second head-to-head TV debate later this month - and said he had no record of redistributing wealth in government.
"What Alex Salmond is asking Scotland to vote for is austerity plus for decades to come," the Labour MP and former chancellor said.
"That is what makes his pitch to Labour voters that there would be fewer cuts and more wealth redistribution in a separate Scotland so cynical.
"There isn't much in his actual record to support his claim to want redistribution. In seven years as First Minister there has been not one policy which redistributes wealth from rich to poor - indeed the opposite is true."
Mr Darling said the debate over the currency of an independent Scotland would lead to cuts under independence.
The Scottish Government favours a formal currency union with the rest of the UK which would allow an independent Scotland to continue to use the Bank of England as its central bank.
The UK Government and the main Westminster parties have already ruled out that option.
Mr Darling said: "The certainty is that the currency chaos he would inflict would lead to more cuts and greater poverty.
"Let's be clear - currency chaos hits the poor harder than anyone.
"The cuts would have to be across the board - from schools to hospitals, from pensions to welfare payments to some of our most vulnerable fellow citizens.
"My starting point is that I want Scotland to be fairer, more prosperous and have greater opportunities. And from that starting point I have come to the conclusion that we are more likely to have the strength to become fairer, more prosperous and have greater opportunities by working with our neighbours in the United Kingdom."
Former Scottish Labour Party chairman Bob Thomson, who is a member of the Labour for Independence group, described Mr Darling's accusation as "weak".
"What is deeply cynical is for Ed Miliband to depict Labour as the party of social justice, then be content to see the overwhelming majority of Labour MPs vote for the Tory welfare cap," Mr Thomson said.
"What is equally cynical is for Ed Balls, the shadow chancellor, to state that a future Labour government at Westminster will stick to Con-Dem austerity which will strip a further £6 billion off the Scottish welfare budget and hammer even more the weakest and most vulnerable.
"This is the cynicism that is helping to drive increasing numbers of Labour members and supporters to Yes because they realise that an independent Scottish Parliament offers a much better way of making sure that the wealth of Scotland works for all the people of Scotland than an out-of-touch Westminster ever has.
"That's why polling shows that more than 200,000 Labour supporters are already planning to vote Yes on September 18.
"Instead of being on the receiving end of Tory governments Scotland didn't vote for, a rebalancing of economic power in these islands away from the over-dominance of London - and an independent Scotland delivering a progressive policy programme - would be of benefit both north and south of the border."
"That's why I and Labour movement figures such as Sir Charles Gray, Eleanor McLaughlin, Alex Mosson, Carol Fox, John Mulvey and countless others are voting Yes in September to see a meaningful package of powers transferred to an independent Scottish Parliament - so that we can deliver policies based on real Labour values here in Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article