THE bid to stop a change to the SNP's historic anti-Nato policy is set to intensify, with campaigners insisting they want to start a "grassroots movement" to defy Alex Salmond and the party leadership.
A meeting of the Nationalists' Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament group in Glasgow yesterday aimed to "educate" SNP members about what the proposed U-turn in policy could mean for the party and to its chances of securing a "yes" vote in the Scottish referendum on independence in 2014.
Opponents of the change believe it would "make the SNP look cynical and lacking in moral courage".
Gareth Finn, SNP CND group convener, said the turnout at the seminar – about 65 people, including MSPs John Finnie, Dave Thompson, Jean Urquhart, Sandra White and John Wilson – was impressive.
"The next step is for members to go back to their SNP branches with that information and pass it around. We want to expand the debate to a grassroots movement rather than just discussing it in the hierarchy of the party."
He added: "The main issue is that Nato is a nuclear alliance and it doesn't fit in with our vision for Scotland. We are a prosperous and outward-looking country, I don't see why we need to be part of the alliance because I don't see any threat to Scotland.
"It's a challenge for those seeking to change party policy to inform us of where they see these threats coming from."
Ten of the SNP's 67 MSPs have so far come out against the leadership's proposal, which is being strongly promoted by Angus Robertson, defence spokesman and leader at Westminster.
One of the opponents of the proposed policy change, Dave Thompson, MSP for Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch, said: "We're better with our current policy because it's the right policy.
"You would need to ask Angus whether he thinks his policy is the right policy or is he purely following opinion polls – that's not for me to say. He's got to come up with sound reasons."
In a briefing paper circulated this week, the Nationalists' CND group argued that changing policy could lose the SNP support and did not guarantee extra votes for independence.
It argued: "It confuses the strategy and makes the SNP look cynical and lacking in moral courage. It alienates almost all active supporters of independence outside the SNP and will cause more conflict within the Yes campaign.
"It removes all differentiation between the SNP and the other parties. It does nothing to counter the media onslaught from those that oppose independence.
"In fact, tactically and strategically, it is hard to see what meaningful benefit it is meant to bring."
However, the leadership has held up a University of Strathclyde poll carried out in May, which found 52% of SNP members surveyed wanted to remain in Nato.
"With an agreement to withdraw Trident from Scotland, we should be willing to work with our neighbours and allies," insisted Mr Robertson.
The contentious proposals are due to be debated at the SNP party conference in October.
Ruth Davidson, the Scottish Conservative leader, said: "The ridiculed Nato stance is only one small element of SNP defence policy that is exceptionally weak."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article