A FORMER economic adviser to Alex Salmond has criticised the First Minister for failing to outline an alternative currency plan in his White Paper on independence.
Professor John Kay, one of the country's leading economists, said it was "rather stupid" not to include a Plan B on currency in case the SNP's proposal to share the pound in a monetary union with the rest of the UK failed.
In a seminar held by the Social Market Foundation think tank, he warned Mr Salmond's exclusive reliance on the currency union proposal could weaken his hand in the negotiations with the UK that would follow a Yes vote in next year's referendum.
He said: "Alex Salmond has said, I think rather stupidly, that there is no plan B. The trouble with having no plan B is you don't have any negotiating power if you don't have a Plan B.
"So there has to be a Plan B. And Plan B has to be an independent currency."
He added: "The Scottish Government has stated definitively that it would continue to use Sterling in a monetary union.
"There is a slight problem about that, in that you have to negotiate a monetary union - it's not entirely clear that you could negotiate a monetary union.
"It's rather hard to see a country that represents 91.5% of a monetary union granting a great deal of oversight of its banking policies and fiscal policies to a country that represents 8.5% of the monetary union."
Mr Kay has previously argued that a new currency would be the most likely outcome for an independent Scotland.
Better Together campaign director Blair McDougall said: "Alex Salmond told us the White Paper would 'resonate down through the ages'. It hasn't even lasted until the weekend."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "Professor Kay's views on this issue are already well-known, and he is entitled to them. The fact is, the pound is as much Scotland's as it is the rest of the UK's."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article