A veteran European negotiator is expected to back the Scottish Government's insistence that an independent Scotland would secure continuing membership of the European Union.
Graham Avery, honorary director general of the European Commission, who has been involved in European accession negotiations for nearly 50 years, is giving evidence at Holyrood's European and External Relations Committee today.
Speaking ahead of the committee, he said the remainder of the UK would "espouse vigorously" the SNP's preferred mode of entry into the EU to avoid a "legal nightmare".
It would not be the interests of the UK or any EU member state to ask Scotland to rejoin as a new state, he said.
"The scenario of an independent Scotland outside the EU and not applying EU rules would be a legal nightmare, create social and economic difficulties for EU citizens, and deprive the EU of benefits of Scotland's membership such as its budgetary contribution and fisheries resources," according to Mr Avery.
"To avoid this unwelcome outcome, one may expect the British Government to espouse vigorously the use of Article 48 in due course."
Article 48 of the Lisbon Treaty allows member states to propose an internal treaty amendment, and the SNP say this could be used to add Scotland as an independent signatory.
Mr Avery will join the growing ranks of EU experts verbally sparring over Scotland's future.
Three eminent lawyers challenged the SNP's claims at Holyrood last week, but they were dismissed by former European Court judge Sir David Edward, who said the UK would have an "obligation" to secure Scotland's continuing membership.
Most experts agree that Scotland will join the EU eventually and at least secure ongoing interim membership while the potentially lengthy accession process is concluded.
But Mr Avery said the SNP's 18-month timescale for EU membership is "realistic", and echoed the views of European lawyer Aiden O'Neill that any decision which deprives Scots of EU citizenship would be a "nightmare scenario".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article