Independence is the best way to protect Scotland's vulnerable families and children, according to a leading campaigner for child protection and welfare.
Anne Houston, who recently retired as chief executive of the charity Children 1st, has backed a Yes vote in September's referendum.
She argued too many people in Scotland are living in poverty and attacked "retrograde" Westminster welfare reforms which she said were hitting people in low-paid employment and those with disabilities.
Ms Houston said: "Vulnerable families and their children are being made more vulnerable.
"It is unacceptable that one in every five of Scotland's children is living in poverty, a rising figure.
"For me the decision is about the difference independence would make to our control over the things that matter most to us. Many of our priorities are patently different from those driven by Westminster.
"I am in no doubt that by taking control of our own decisions and meeting our own priorities with independence we have a much better chance of giving our children the protection and support they deserve."
Ms Houston stressed her lack of party affiliation and said her decision to back independence had been shaped by 40 years of personal experience in child protection.
She said: "People often say children are our future and that is true, but they deserve more.
"We should value our children - and in a small country like this with our own choices we can do that better.
"This is about a positive vote for our future and is not about voting for any particular political party - that comes later.
"In an independent Scotland we can together identify the fundamental principles that will address what we care about and believe in - our aspirations for our country. That's why I'll be voting Yes on September 18."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article