TWO leading independence campaigners have spoken out against Alex Salmond's plan for a currency union with the UK if Scots vote to go it alone next year.
Jim Fairlie, a former deputy leader of the SNP, said the most sensible option for an independent Scotland would be to establish a new currency.
Colin Fox, the leader of the SSP and a Yes Scotland campaign board member, also backed a new currency, arguing the proposed currency zone would hand power and control to the Bank of England.
They spoke out a week after Chancellor George Osborne warned the UK was unlikely to agree to a currency union with a newly independent Scotland. If the UK did agree, he added, it would place considerable constraints on Scotland's economic policies.
Mr Fairlie, who is no longer an SNP member, dismissed the plan in an article for Options for Scotland, an online forum set up by former party leader Gordon Wilson. He admitted an independent Scottish currency "may cause a level of nervousness" but said it was the only option to provide full control of economic policy.
He added: "If sovereignty means anything at all to the Scottish people, control of their own currency is a prerequisite."
Mr Fairlie's comments were backed by Mr Wilson, who said the currency union plan was undermining the pro-independence campaign.
Mr Fox wrote in his blog: "It goes without saying that keeping the pound or establishing a sterling zone means handing over a considerable amount of power and control over Scotland's economy and spending options to the Bank of England and the City of London. And many will in-evitably ask what then is the point of Independence?"
Their comments echo views voiced by Jim Cuthbert, an economist frequently cited by the SNP, and John Kay, a former economic adviser to the First Minister.
The pro-independence Scottish Greens have also urged the SNP to keep the option of a new currency open.
Pro-UK campaigners seized on the remarks.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article