The European Commission "may have set itself on a collision course" with the courts with its "schizophrenic" stance on Scottish independence, a Scottish Parliament adviser has said.
Dr Daniel Kenealy, adviser to Holyrood's European and External Relations Committee, said suggestions by EC president Jose Manuel Barroso and others that a seceding country would be a "new state" and would have to reapply for membership "is entirely inconsistent with the general principles of the EU".
Unionists argue Scotland faces a potentially prolonged EU accession if it becomes independent.
But Dr Kenealy said the process of expelling a country is equally problematic, pointing out that it took six years to negotiate the departure of Greenland.
He has proposed "a practical solution" to Scotland's continuing membership in line with the Scottish Government's White Paper on independence.
But he advised the SNP to abandon its proposals to keep the UK's budget rebate, and to drop its opt-out of the euro - which he said Scotland would not have to adopt anyway.
Writing in the Journal of European Integration, Dr Kenealy said: "The EU would border on the schizophrenic were it to expel a part of its territory for exercising a democratic right to self-determination.
"If followed to the letter, the commission's position would create a sudden and sharp dislocation within the EU's single market, thus making it impractical.
"In offering a black and white statement on a matter better defined by shades of grey, the commission may have set itself on a collision course with the European Court of Justice at some future date.
"It is entirely inconsistent with the general principles of the EU to seek to expel the territory of Scotland, and potentially to strip millions of their EU citizenship, as a result of the exercise of a democratic right.
"The commission has thus come up with an immediate mechanism of withdrawal from the EU. That mechanism stands in contrast to the formal withdrawal mechanism (which) speaks to the impracticalities of suddenly cutting loose an existing part of the EU's territory.
"The delay and agreement strategy is there precisely to avoid sudden and sharp dislocations in the single market. The principle is that of no immediate or automatic withdrawal or expulsion.
"Greenland's withdrawal is illustrative insofar as it took six years for agreement to be reached on the terms of its departure.
"Implicit in the logic is recognition that the nature of the rights and obligations that flow from the treaties, the interdependencies that it fosters, and the movement of people and capital that is facilities, cannot simply be turned off or reversed."
He said the Scottish Government could negotiate continuing membership under article 48 of the Lisbon Treaty, in line with the SNP's plan, but has advised the Scottish Government "not to use this negotiation as an opportunity to secure their own opt-outs and special provisions".
He added: "It is almost impossible to imagine the member states agreeing to allow Scotland to inherit a version of the UK budget abatement.
"Similarly, the UK's opt-out on the euro, shared only with Denmark, is something that Scotland may be wise not to put up a fight to retain.
"The currency situation in an independent Scotland remains clouded with uncertainty. Scotland would certainly gain a derogation from eurozone membership and, should it choose, could adopt the Swedish option of de facto exercising a right to opt-out of the currency.
"In short, it could not be required to adopt the euro as its currency.
"The one special provision that would be most important for Scotland to retain would be the UK opt-out on various Schengen (passport-free travel) provisions."
SNP MSP Clare Adamson, who sits on the European and External Relations Committee, said: "Dr Kenealy's comments add to the considerable range of experts who have rightly dismissed the scare stories over Scotland's place in the EU.
"Those experts include honorary director-general of the Commission Graeme Avery, who said 'It's obvious that the common sense solution would be for Scotland's membership of the European Union to be effective on the same day as its independence'.
"Scotland has been a part of the EU for over 40 years and it is in absolutely nobody's interest for Scotland to be excluded - which is why it will not happen. Indeed the only threat to Scotland's continued place in Europe is the anti-EU agenda dominating Westminster, which could see Scotland dragged out against our will if there is a No vote in September."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article