INDEPENDENCE campaigners need to "go into attack" over the notion of British identity, former SNP leader Gordon Wilson has told party activists.
He said the Yes side's arguments must also focus on less positive areas such as the consequences of a No vote, which would result in Scotland being "thrown into despair".
Speaking at a fringe meeting during the SNP's conference, he said: "If this referendum fails, it will fail on the basis that people put their British identity ahead of their Scottish identity.
"So, therefore, when we look at what we are going to do in the final stages, we have got to go into attack on the British identity.
"We cannot allow ourselves to be complacent, to stand back and hope things will come our way."
Mr Wilson told delegates at the Law Society of Scotland fringe event that there are several areas where the campaign for independence needs to make an impact, such as the north-south divide and the consequences of a No vote.
He said: "It's not all that positive but it has to be done. What will happen if Scotland votes No? For those who are in the No camp thinking their future is safe and secure, forget it.
"I only wish we were as half as intelligent as the Downing Street Mafia in some ways, and as tough as the English, because Scotland has been taken to the cleaners.
"If Scotland votes No, our clout will disappear, we will be thrown into despair. And any promises we get for devo max? Forget it."
Mr Wilson said Scots law would be diminished by a No vote, with the country's unique legal system being assimilated to that of England, while "the wings of the Scottish Parliament are likely to be clipped".
His comments follow the publication in August of his critical analysis of the Yes campaign in which he said there is "absence of vision, passion and emotion".
Professor John Curtice of Strathclyde University said: "Feeling Scottish is a source of consensus in this society.
"The problem from your perspective is, at the moment, it is how British people feel that is more clearly related to whether they are for or against independence than how Scottish they feel."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article