INDEPENDENCE could help "rebalance" politics in England away from London, Humza Yousaf, the Scottish Government's External Affairs Minister, has said.
The SNP MSP also argued that if Scotland broke away from the UK, it would have a bigger voice on the international stage, dismissing the warning earlier this week from Sir John Major, the former Prime Minister, who claimed its influence would be diminished if it were no longer a part of the Union.
In March, First Minister Alex Salmond in a New Statesman lecture given in Westminster said: "After Scottish independence, the growth of a strong economic power in the north of these islands would benefit everyone.
"There would be a Northern Light to redress the influence of the dark star, rebalancing the economic centre of gravity of these islands."
Yesterday, Mr Yousaf, asked what impact a Yes vote would have for England, said: "If anything, my hope is and my desire is there's a rebalance of politics across England.
"I do much travelling, and recently I did BBC Question Time in Coventry, and there people felt completely disconnected from the politics in London.
"Hopefully, if and when Scotland becomes independent, it will force London politicians to think more about the Midlands, the West Midlands, the north of England, which have suffered historic neglect regardless of whether Labour or Conservatives have been in power."
The Scottish Minister dismissed the warning from Sir John, noting how, given under his leadership the Tories were wiped out in Scotland in 1997, he would not take his advice on Scottish politics.
Mr Yousaf claimed Sir John's argument was not borne out by the facts, arguing small countries were "hugely influential".
"Academics have shown that small countries in the EU, when it comes to negotiations and deals, get a better deal than the bigger countries," he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article