Two prisoners serving life sentences who say rules which bar them from voting in the Scottish independence referendum breach their human rights have lost a fight in the UK's highest court.
The Supreme Court dismissed claims brought by Leslie Moohan and Andrew Gillon following a hearing in London today.
Their claims had already been dismissed by judges in Scotland.
Supreme Court president Lord Neuberger told lawyers that the prisoners' appeals were dismissed after a day-long hearing.
He said reasons for the decision would be given at a later date.
A panel of Supreme Court justices analysed provisions contained in the Scottish Independence Referendum (Franchise) Act 2013.
The panel had considered a series of legal questions, including whether provisions prohibiting prisoner voting were incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights and whether they breached the common law right to vote.
The justices were told that both inmates want to vote in the referendum on September 18 but are not eligible under the Franchise Act.
Lawyers for the two men argued that the prohibition is incompatible with prisoners' rights under common and European law.
But the justices disagreed.
The prisoners had appealed to the Supreme Court after their claims had been dismissed in Scotland by the Outer House and Inner House of the Court of Session.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article