SCOTLAND'S islands are about to stake their claim for a separate place in Europe, with direct involvement in policy-making in Brussels.
Orkney, Shetland and the Western Isles are also targeting specific provision for them within any new European Union accession treaty.
The scale of the island councils' ambitions were unveiled yesterday at the start of a two-day conference in Kirkwall about their attempts to win greater powers.
Steven Heddle, Orkney's leader, identified enhancing the islands' relationship with Europe as a crucial policy area of their campaign to win more influence and access to EU funding.
He said this could be achieved through regional status and a seat, or seats, on the European Committee of the Regions.
But Mr Heddle said the islands councils could aim higher: "We could ask to be represented directly in Brussels as part of the national representation of our member state, be it the UK or Scotland, as is the case with other islands."
The idea is that the proposals would allow the islands to monitor European legislation, in the same way as Madeira, the Azores and the Baltic Aland Islands.
Mr Heddle added: "We should be bold and seize the opportunities that may arise, such as ensuring that we are written into any new EU accession treaty that proves necessary for an independent Scotland, to give our islands a legal guarantee of a better level of recognition by the EU."
Orkney, Shetland and Western Isles councils recently launched their "Our Islands, Our Future" campaign to win more powers regardless of what happens in next year's referendum.
Mr Heddle argued the current provision in Holyrood's standing orders that there should be an assessment of how any Bill would affect island communities was inadequate.
He said allowing the islands to be treated equally with other parts of Scotland would promote good relations between local and central government. The councils also want the Scottish Parliament to treat remoteness and insularity as issues of equality when legislating, and move towards passing an act securing the islands' authorities in the future.
Angus Campbell, leader of the Western Isles Council, said the islands had the power to "make things happen," but control of their resources was a major challenge.
He added: "We have come a long way from the private landlords owning the land and deciding what was best for the communities.
"In the region of 70% of the population of the Outer Hebrides now lives on community-owned land, and our communities are the better for it.
"But none of the seabed around our shores belongs to the community - or even generates any significant income for local communities. It belongs to the Crown Estate,who at best pay lip service to local communities, and certainly not pounds and pence."
Shetland councillor Gary Robinson questioned a misconception that Scotland or the UK had to subsidise their lives. He said that while key ferry services did receive subsidy, the islands provided rich seams of finance for the public purse.
Mr Robinson said: "I am sure it hasn't escaped our respective governments' attention that 80% of he UK's territorial waters surround our three island groups. These are the areas that have already given up billions in oil revenue to the UK Exchequer and hundreds of millions in fish catching, aquaculture and Crown Estates revenues."
He said it had been estimated that around 25% of the £300 billion-plus that the UK Treasury had derived from oil and gas in tax had been levied on throughput at the Sullom Voe oil terminal in Shetland.
Islay councillor Robin Currie pointed out that Argyll and Bute had 25 populated islands, more than anywhere else in Scotland, and faced the same scale of transport problems other island communities.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article