A PROMINENT lawyer who faced calls to stand down from his Scottish Government-appointed post after Twitter abuse at Alex Salmond has apologised.
Mike Dailly, a leading figure in the Labour Party in Glasgow and pro-Union campaigner, described the First Minister as "an a***hole" on Saturday.
He refused calls from the organisation's chairwoman to resign from his £8000-a-year part-time post on the board of the Scottish Housing Regulator, an independent watchdog which reports to the Scottish Government.
But three days after the latest 'Twitter storm', the former Solicitor of the Year issued an apology.
Mr Dailly said he "never actually never meant to be disrespectful to the First Minister" and that he was "trying to show how abusive the debate in Scotland has become, especially in the social media".
He said: "The point I was trying to make (and I accept I failed) was that the political debate in Scotland is nasty and abusive; and we need to raise it; and the tone is set from the top. In the end it was a clumsy attempt to prove a point. It was not my finest moment.
"I have always argued passionately for things I believe in. This time my passion ran away with me." He concludes: "It has reminded me how important it is to stay civil. Perhaps we all need to take a good look at how we conduct ourselves in this debate. Me included. But for my part, I say sorry."
Saturday's tweet sparked a wave of responses, including from his Scottish Labour's chairman Jamie Glackin, who said: "Steady on Mike! We may be disagree with him but he's better than that. As are you!"
Scottish Greens co-convenor Patrick Harvie said: "I'm very far from being a Salmond fan, but Mike, you can do better than this."
Earlier yesterday, an SNP spokesman said: "It is in all of our interests for the debate on Scotland's future to be a respectful and positive one.
"Denigration of individuals has no role to play and supporters on both sides must do all they can to raise the level of debate."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article