The SNP have hit out at plans to tell older people how long they can expect to live to prevent them blowing their pensions on fast cars.
Sending the forecasts to retirees would cause distress and be insensitive, one of the party's MSPs said.
Coalition ministers have said the letters could be sent out as early as next year.
The proposal follows criticism over planned pensions reforms that would mean no-one was forced to buy an annuity.
Opponents warn the changes could lead pensioners to spend all their cash instead of saving for old age.
While they reject that argument, Tory-Lib Dem ministers do believe many older people underestimate how long they will live.
An estimate of when they might die, based on gender and where they live, could allow older people to plan ahead but also allow them to spend any savings.
But SNP MSP Annabelle Ewing, who sits on Holyrood's Welfare Reform Committee, said: "Writing to individual people with a prediction of their life expectancy is insensitive and likely only to cause distress."
A leading pensions expert warned retirees risk being misled by the estimates.
Ros Altmann, an independent pensions expert and a former Downing Street adviser, said the information would be "not terribly helpful" unless regularly revised.
"By the time five or 10 years have gone by, things can change by a big amount for lots of people," she said.
The proposed guidance could be rolled out as early as April next year.
Last month, LibDem pensions minister Steve Webb was criticised for saying he was "relaxed" about pensioners using their money to buy a Lamborghini.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article