FORMER Prime Minister John Major has accused the SNP of holding the independence referendum in the year of the 700th anniversary of the Battle of Bannockburn in an effort to whip up anti-English feeling.
Sir John, who was premier from 1990 to 1997, claimed the referendum debate was a battle between "emotion and pride" on the Yes side and "facts" from the No campaign.
Addressing a journalists' event in Edinburgh, he said: "We were at war centuries ago which is why, to be brutally frank, I find it rather sad that the SNP chose the anniversary of the Battle of Bannockburn for the vote, presumably to maximise the opportunity for any anti-English sentiment that may exist."
He said the SNP had ignored "two bigger anniversaries" this year, D-Day and the outbreak of WWI, when Scots fought as "brothers in arms" with comrades from the rest of the UK.
Sir John accused the SNP of seeking to create "grievance and ill-feeling" between Scotland and the rest of the UK for the past 20 years as a tactic to win support for independence.
He warned that in the event of a narrow victory for the No campaign, the debate over independence would continue but become "even more divisive than it has become, not only within Scotland but between Scotland and the other component parts of the UK".
Sir John, who has intervened only rarely in the independence debate, mounted a passionate defence of the Union, describing it as one of the most successful partnerships in history.
He claimed First Minister Alex Salmond was "deceiving the Scottish electorate" about the consequences of leaving the UK.
He dismissed the SNP's claim that an independent Scotland would join the EU swiftly and on the same terms as the UK, including a share of its valuable budget rebate.
Sir John, who negotiated the UK's opt-out from the euro single currency in 1991, said the chances were "somewhere between nought and nil". He also called for a major new constitutional agreement between the parties to devolve powers to Scotland but balance the move by recognising the impact on England.
He said an "equitable long-term settlement" would have to answer the West Lothian Question or "West Berkshire Question," as he renamed it - over Scots MPs having a say on policies affecting only England.
He said he supported further devolution for the same reason he opposed it in the early 1990s: to "protect the Union".
He also said it was "absurd" to argue the three main pro-UK parties would backtrack on promises to hand Holyrood more powers in the event of a No vote.
He said: "The three major parties of the UK could not possibly resile from such explicit and important commitments and I'm confident they will not."
SNP MSP Stewart Maxwell said: "John Major is perfectly entitled to his view, but his comments are woefully out of touch.
"He was wrong about a Scottish Parliament in the 1990s, and he is wrong about an independent Scotland now."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article