THE Ministry of Defence is to launch a major drive to inform Scottish military personnel about how they can vote in next year's independence referendum after concerns were raised that thousands could miss out on helping to determine Scotland's future.
Ian Davidson, Labour Chairman of the Commons Scottish Affairs Committee, has expressed alarm Whitehall does not appear to be on top of the issue.
At a session earlier this week, the committee chairman said the MoD's apparent lack of understanding on the issue caused him "a bit of alarm", noting: "Simply having people registered to vote is not sufficient for the purposes we have identified." He called for a progress report from the MoD.
Later, a Whitehall source, asked by The Herald if the Ministry was about to launch a campaign to inform Scottish personnel of their ability to vote in next September's poll, said: "Yes, we are. We are about to in the next few days, specifically for the Scottish referendum."
He added: "We are intending to issue instructions very much on the lines that the chairman implied but obviously it's a personal decision. We will make them aware of what their rights are in this."
The Herald has been told that a programme of information, part of which will be in association with the Electoral Commission, will run through to September.
A Commission spokeswoman added: "Our intention is to do some further work on this through to next summer, such as identifying which regiments have high proportions of Scots and where they are based."
Mr Davidson warned: "What we don't want is that, after the referendum, members of our armed forces say we were not told we could have voted because we did not have it properly explained to us."
He also attacked the Scottish Government, saying: "We are anxious and believe it is deliberately trying to minimise the take-up of votes by service personnel and their families because it believes they will vote against separation."
But a Scottish Government spokeswoman hit back, saying: "These claims are completely wrong and have no basis in fact.
"A Bill, passed by the Scottish Parliament today, will ensure the vote will be run to the highest international standards."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article