AN independent Scotland would have an immigration policy characterised by "fairness and compassion" which would attract skilled workers and help achieve sustainable economic growth, the Culture and External Affairs Secretary has said.
Such a system would be aimed for in the event of a Yes vote in the referendum, Fiona Hyslop said.
The comments were made as MSPs debated the findings of the 2011 census.
Labour's Patricia Ferguson said the census results help make the case for Scotland staying in the UK.
Scotland's population is "ageing faster than that of the UK as a whole" and extra cash would be needed to pay for pensions if the country became independent, Ms Ferguson said.
Ms Hyslop said that the 2011 census shows the highest-ever population for Scotland at 5,295,403.
"Much of the population increase, however, was due to net migration to Scotland and we are proud of the warm welcome we give migrants to Scotland, encouraging those who want to work hard to build a life here for their families and we know they enrich our culture and communities with their traditions, skills, food and languages," Ms Hyslop said.
The 2011 census shows for the first time that Scotland has more people aged 65 and above than those under 16.
Population projections show rise in the number of pensioners between 2012 and 2037 will be less than across the UK as a whole, at 27% against 31%, Ms Hyslop said. "With independence we would be able to grow our working-age population by ensuring young Scots have the opportunity to build a career in Scotland, and a controlled immigration policy will be another gain."
Immigration policy in an independent Scotland would take into account "Scottish principles of fairness and compassion", she said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article