RBS will "adapt" to serve the whole of the former United Kingdom if Scotland votes for independence, according to the bank's chief executive.
Ross McEwan said he has not spoken to UK Business Secretary Vince Cable about moving the bank's head office, after Mr Cable speculated that it would "inevitably become a London bank" in the event of independence.
He made his comments in an online question and answer forum for The Guardian website, in which one user asked: "Vince Cable said last week that RBS would remove its headquarters from Scotland if there was a yes vote in the independence referendum. Is this the case?"
Mr McEwan replied: "We've been in Scotland for nearly 300 years. So I need to take this independence issue very seriously.
"We've also been operating in the rest of the UK for nearly hundreds of years and have a royal charter.
"It's really important that the Scottish people get the opportunity to vote, and then if I need to adapt my business to serve England, Scotland, Wales and both the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, then I will.
"Mr Cable and I have not talked about moving our head office."
Barclays chief executive Antony Jenkins has already said the bank "can make it work either way" with regards to Scottish independence.
Mr Jenkins made his comments during an interview with the BBC when he said the future of Scotland was a "matter for the Scottish people to decide: we think we can make it work either way as a bank".
It follows comments by BP's chief executive Bob Dudley, who said last week there were "quite big uncertainties" surrounding independence in the run up to the referendum on September 18. He added: "I'm not concerned but there's enough uncertainty and talk about it and questions raised."
He also said he didn't "know the answer" to the currency question.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article