THE propaganda war about the future of Scotland escalates today as the anti-independence, pro-UK campaign formally gets off the ground in Edinburgh.
Against a backdrop of pro-independence, anti-UK forces firing warning shots from the sidelines, Alistair Darling, head of the Better Together campaign, will say posing the independence question is "like asking us to buy a one-way ticket to send our children to a deeply uncertain destination".
Just as anti-independence forces tried to cast a cloud over the launch of Yes Scotland with a poll – which conveniently supported their argument – so today the pro-independence forces try to spoil the launch of Better Together with a poll – which, not unsurprisingly, supports their argument.
This morning, commuters across Scotland will have leaflets thrust in their hands and newspaper readers are faced with full-page adverts telling them how great it is to be part of the UK and that they can have the "best of both worlds" by saying yes to the Union – a strong, distinctive Holyrood in a strong, distinctive UK.
By sheer coincidence, the SNP's Stewart Hosie yesterday sought to claim the same slogan for the Nationalists when he said Scots could have "the best of both worlds", which, in his terms, was an independent Scotland with a strong social union with the English, keeping, of course, the Queen as head of state and sterling as the currency.
There are also seemed to be another coincidence when Andrew Mitchell, the International Development Secretary, popped up on television to announce that UK aid from now on would bear the Union flag with the tag "From the British People", while the Ministry of Defence insisted there would be a round of flag-waving for the UK Armed Forces this week to mark Armed Forces Day. Could these be subliminal messages aimed at Scottish voters?
Of course, the issue on which Messrs Moore and Salmond have yet to engage fully – should there be one or two questions on the referendum ballot paper – continues to make its presence known. A poll commissioned by the Future of Scotland group, which wants to see a less polarised debate, showed a 56% to 44% majority in favour of a second question with supporters of all the main parties, barring the Tories, supportive.
Whitehall sources have made it clear to The Herald that David Cameron will vote SNP before he allows a second question.
Indeed, the offer that will be made to the First Minister when talks finally get under way is that a Section 30 Order enabling Holyrood to hold a legal poll will be forthcoming but on one condition – there is a single question.
The Prime Minister fears two questions will be legally challenged. Senior Coalition sources have even suggested he is willing for Westminster to hold a poll if that is the only way Scots can have a fair and legal vote.
In his Herald interview, Mr Darling predicted Nationalist forces would begin to push harder for a second question, fearing defeat if there was only one.
By sheer coincidence – again – Mr Hosie said yesterday: "The case for independence trumps any case for further devolution but there are those who believe in further devolution and, of course, they should be allowed to test that against independence and the status quo."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article