Concerns over the future of an independent Scotland's fiscal position, the size of its banking sector and its monetary regime have been highlighted in a report by a global banking group.
The publication from Citi also looks at the possible currency and debt arrangements in the event of a yes vote, and considers the strength of Scotland's credit rating.
It found that an independent Scotland's fiscal position would be "relatively weak and risky" while a monetary union between Scotland and the rest of the UK is "unlikely".
The report has been compiled jointly by Citi's economics, rate strategy and political analysis teams ahead of the September referendum.
The Scottish Government backs a formal monetary union, in which an independent Scotland and the rest of the UK would share the pound, but this option has been ruled out by the unionist parties.
Citi's report says: "We regard a sterling monetary union as unlikely but we are genuinely unsure what currency and monetary policy would be adopted by an independent Scotland.
"In our view, it is astonishing that the Scottish Government, in seeking independence, has reached this stage: seeking a currency union without agreement with the rest of the UK and without a clear alternative plan."
It continued: "Overall, we believe an independent Scotland would have a relatively weak and risky fiscal position. This might well produce a sizeable borrowing premium.
"With this backdrop, we do not consider the Scottish Government's threat - that if a currency union is refused, Scotland will walk away from its share of UK national debt - to be wholly a bluff."
The report also notes concerns about the effects of drops in oil revenues and the size of Scotland's banking sector, which it said creates "additional fiscal risks".
It goes on to consider future credit ratings for an independent Scotland.
"It is unlikely, in our view, that Scotland would be given the top AAA rating, but highly likely that it would be investment grade," the report said.
"The exact rating would depend on many factors, including the fiscal position - which might well be worse than that of the UK.
"Our best guess, weighing up the uncertainties, is that an independent Scotland would be rated in the high 'single A' region with risks on either side."
It warned that any suggestions that Scotland would walk away from its share of national debt could "negatively impact" on credit ratings.
Citi also highlights the "referendum risks" associated with a proposed vote on Britain's European Union membership.
Even a failed vote might "set the stage for market-moving surprise and generate heightened uncertainty", it said.
"Brexit (Britain's exit from the EU) would have significant policy impact that should not be taken lightly."
Scottish Secretary Alistair Carmichael said: "The Citi report identifies a number of further risks, such as falling oil revenues and a rising Scottish deficit as well as the uncertainty for business created by losing the UK pound.
"It's absolutely clear independence would be a big problem for Scotland rather than the solution - and not having any sort of currency plan makes it an even bigger problem."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "As leading international credit rating agency Standard and Poor's last week concluded, Scotland's wealth levels 'are comparable' to those of AAA-listed nations, and that as an independent country - even without North Sea oil - Scotland would qualify for S&P's 'highest economic assessment'.
"The Fiscal Commission Working Group, which comprises economic experts including two Nobel Laureates, has already considered a range of currency options in its detailed report published a year ago, and concluded that it is in the interests of both Scotland and the UK to continue to retain Sterling in a formal monetary union, and that is the policy the Scottish Government proposes.
"The pound is as much Scotland's as it is the rest of the UK's, and the Scottish Government has put forward sensible proposals for a formal monetary union that would ensure both governments had full flexibility over their fiscal policies such as taxation, within an overall sustainable framework."
Better Together campaign director Blair McDougall said the Citi report had left the SNP's economic credibility at "a new low".
"All the money we get from the North Sea is used to fund our public services and pay for benefits and pensions," he said.
"Being part of the larger UK means we can take advantage of this vital resource without gambling the budget for our schools and hospitals on a volatile, declining resource. It's the best of both worlds.
"As Citi argues, it is astonishing that the nationalists haven't set out their Plan B on what would replace the pound. Would we rush to adopt the Euro or set up a separate unproven currency? Alex Salmond cannot spend the next six months denying economic realities."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article