A ROW has broken out at a Scottish university after three senior academics e-mailed colleagues about the dangers of a Yes vote.
The message - sent to staff from Edinburgh University's College of Science and Engineering and the College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine - suggested independence could damage research funding.
It was signed by Professor Robin Allshire, from the Institute of Cell Biology, his colleague Professor Susan Rosser and Professor Andrew Millar, from the Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology.
While the Scottish Government is the largest single source of university research funding, with £330m allocated in 2012/13, the second largest contribution is the £240m in competitively awarded grants from the UK Research Councils.
The letter stated: "There is now legitimate concern among our research community that full independence will reduce the funding pot available to the University of Edinburgh, especially over the next five years and beyond."
The letter said that, in the longer term, it was unclear how much an independent Scottish Government could prioritise research funding relative to other competing interests.
Dr Stephen Watson, chairman of the pro-independence group Academics for Yes, refuted the suggestions - and called on Edinburgh University authorities to allow a counter message to be sent to all staff.
He said: "This was a political piece aimed at persuading colleagues to vote "No" in this week's independence referendum and, while an open debate should be encouraged, this seems to us to be an inappropriate way to achieve this end.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article