ALEX Salmond has denied claims that the Scottish Government is drawing up a report calculating the start-up costs of an independent Scotland.
However he confirmed he has held a meeting with an academic whose estimate of about £250m he has endorsed.
Speaking during First Minister's Questions, Mr Salmond dismissed as "nonsense" claims in a newspaper that a report was being rushed out.
However he said he and government officials had met Professor Patrick Dunleavy, of the London School of Economics, to discuss the academic's work.
Last month the expert dismissed UK Treasury claims, based on his own research, that it could cost up to £2.7billion to create a range of new institutions such as a ministry of defence, foreign office and benefits and pensions department.
A leaked cabinet briefing from 2012 revealed that work on start-up of costs of an independent Scotland was being carried out.
Since then, however, ministers have insisted it would be impossible to calculate a figure because much of the infrastructure required to run the country would be subject of negotiations.
Scots Tory leader Ruth Davidson said: "For Alex Salmond to continue hawking around his version of independence, while refusing to say how much it's going to cost, is nothing but an attempt to con people.
"How can people believe Alex Salmond's claims on the economy of an independent Scotland in 2020 when he can't tell them the set up costs in 2016?"
Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie said the "First Minister still doesn't have a clue about set-up costs" if there is a Yes vote in September.
Mr Salmond claimed the "unionist cabal" were trying to "exaggerate the costs of an independent Scotland".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article