ALEX SALMOND has put trust in his leadership at the heart of the referendum debate in a bold opening speech to the SNP conference.
The First Minister claimed the public's faith in his Government would prove the Nationalists' strongest suit in the remaining 11 months of the campaign.
He insisted trust in the Scottish Government had averted a firefighters' strike in Scotland and should be credited with signs of economic improvement, including rising employment, exports and inward investments.
The claim underpinned one of the key messages the SNP aim to promote during their last full gathering before the referendum - that Scotland faces a "choice of two futures" between Holyrood rule or a Westminster Government unaccountable to Scots.
Addressing delegates at Perth Concert Hall, Mr Salmond said: "As we go through this week and this coming year there is going to be a theme that I think is very much our strongest suit, and that's the question of trust, trust in the Scottish Government.
"The reason for our success in office is that people trust the Scottish Government to act in the best interests of Scotland."
He cited polling suggesting nearly four times as many Scots trusted the Scottish, rather than UK, Government to put Scotland first and majorities for handing Holyrood control over tax, welfare and pensions.
He added: "That is the natural majority which exists for Scottish independence. It exists in this land at the moment and I believe it will be reflected in a majority for Yes next September."
The SNP will use their annual conference, which runs until Sunday, to highlight the message that both sides in the referendum debate agree Scotland could be a viable independent country.
Ministers are expected to focus less on specific policies for an independent Scotland, with their White Paper, the detailed blueprint for how a split would work in practice, not due until next month.
Mr Salmond said: "No-one now denies the reality that Scotland has got what it takes to be an independent country.
"People in the No campaign cannot deny the economic viability and potential of people-talented, resource rich Scotland."
Referring to the pro-UK Better Together campaign as "Project Fear," he added: "When even the bitterest opponents of Scottish independence agree that Scotland has got what it takes, then it's clear the only thing people have to fear is 'Project Fear' itself."
However, he faced an angry reaction from the Better Together campaign after he quoted figures showing Scotland had more leading universities than any other country of its size, with three institutions in the world's top 100.
Kezia Dugdale, Scottish Labour's education spokeswoman speaking for the campaign, highlighted academics' fears over the future of higher education.
At a conference in Aberdeen, Professor Chris Hawkesworth, Vice-Principal of St Andrews University, said independence was "likely to significantly to disadvantage researchers in Scotland".
He warned: "The implication is that with time an independent Scotland would have one, rather than three, universities in the top 100."
Another academic, Rick Rylance, chairman of Research Councils UK, said that "separation would adversely impact this overall performance".
Ms Dugdale MSP said: "We are all proud of Scotland's world-leading universities, but Alex Salmond must be honest about the consequences of separation for higher education and research. Our universities benefit from disproportionately high levels of funding from UK Research Councils.
"Pooling and sharing our resources across the UK means Scotland's top universities can compete with the world's best. Why would we want to put this at risk?"
Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson said: "Alex Salmond talks about trust. Perhaps people could trust him more if he told the truth about basic things such as having legal advice on Scotland's status in the EU even though he doesn't."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article