Scotland should not have to enter the European Union (EU) as a completely new state if it becomes independent, according to a leading international lawyer.
Experts are divided over an independent Scotland's potential future in the EU.
Some believe Scotland will have to apply as a new state, with the remainder of the UK continuing as before, while others believe both parts of the former UK will be admitted or ejected on equal terms.
But Professor David Scheffer, a former US ambassador for war crimes and special adviser to then Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, said Scotland should enjoy joint-successor status with the UK.
Scheffer said despite a strong argument for Scotland being ejected and asked to reapply, the more logical course would be to treat Scotland and the UK as joint-successor states, with the rights and opt-outs from EU treaties they currently enjoy.
"My argument, quite frankly, is that we have two co-equal successor states. We don't have a situation where I'm going to call the British Government the predecessor state that retains all of the rights - and then Scotland is a successor state somehow cast adrift, told to start from a clean slate as some kind of new state."
He added: "I think, with the more logical argument, that the most appropriate way to handle the situation is to refer to each entity as successor states."
Blair Jenkins, chief executive of pro-independence campaign Yes Scotland, said: "Professor Scheffer - completely demolishes misleading claims that somehow Scotland would be expelled from the EU on independence."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article