DEFENCE companies based in Scotland would not be eligible to compete for nearly two-thirds of Ministry of Defence contracts if the country became independent, according to a UK Government report published today.
The Whitehall study says 63% to 64% of MoD procurement contracts in 2011 and 2012 were placed with UK companies on national security grounds. Last year, nearly £13 billion of the MoD's £20bn procurement budget was spent with UK companies. The MoD used exemptions to EU trade rules to ensure orders went to British-based suppliers.
Today's report, to be unveiled by Defence Secretary Philip Hammond during a visit to a defence manufacturer in Edinburgh, insists the UK Government would continue to place orders with UK firms if Scotland became independent.
The report says: "In the event of independence, companies based in an independent Scottish state would no longer be eligible for contracts that the UK chose to place or compete domestically for national security reasons; and where they could continue to compete they would be pitching for business in a competitive international market."
Mr Hammond is expected to say: "The Scottish people deserve to know what the impact of independence would be on the jobs and livelihoods of the many thousands of people in Scotland that are employed in the UK Armed Forces or in the defence industry that equips and supports them."
Scottish Government veterans minister Keith Brown said Scotland had suffered from deeper cuts to defence spending than the rest of the UK. He said: "The most recent figures indicate only £2bn is being spent by the MoD in Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article