SCOTS would no longer be British if they voted for independence, Ed Miliband warned yesterday, dismissing the notion he said was being offered by Alex Salmond that Scotland could choose to keep the things it liked about the United Kingdom.
In a speech in London about "progressive patriotism" and how the English must assert their own national identity, the Labour leader denigrated what he called "narrow nationalism" and insisted Britons could have plural identities.
He explained how the SNP's outlook meant that "identification with one of our nations was diminished by the identity with the country as a whole. Do you want to be Scottish or British? I say you can be both".
Mr Miliband claimed the First Minister had something of a problem when it came to the issue of identity, saying he knew he was "on extremely thin ice". He explained: "In the very act of leaving the United Kingdom, clearly people would not be British any more in the same sense as they were."
He went on: "Whenever Alex Salmond comes across something people quite like about the Union, he says you can have that as well – the Queen, the Army, the BBC, Britishness, the currency ... the Bank of England. It's a kind of argument that suggests he does not have much confidence in his own argument.
"People can be Scottish and British within the UK, if they feel primarily Scottish, that's fine too. But Alex Salmond can't have it both ways because if you want to leave the United Kingdom, people won't be British any more, it stands to reason ... The SNP are going to force people to choose."
The Labour leader argued that Scotland and England were "intertwined" economically, culturally and socially and that an independent Scotland could never really deliver social justice for its people.
He said: "Alex Salmond says the relationship will be like the Scandinavian countries, but once you start off with this kind of history that we have of being so intertwined, the idea you can make Scotland a fairer place but not do the same in England without causing huge issues right across the borders, it seems to me to be nonsense...
"If you want, for example, to change the way companies work. Well, you're not going to affect most employees in Scotland if you just deal with companies headquartered in Scotland because you're going to leave out of the count all of those companies headquartered in the rest of the UK.
"So it's a very simple point: if you want social justice in Scotland, you can't do it on its own, it has to be done as part of the United Kingdom."
In his speech, the Labour leader admitted his party had been too reluctant in the past to talk about England, partly because people were nervous of it being identified with "the kind of nationalism that left people ill at ease".
He said: "We have rightly applauded the expression of Scottish identity within the United Kingdom, but for too long people have believed to express English identity is to undermine the United Kingdom. This does not make sense. You can be proudly Scottish and British and you can be proudly English and British, as I am."
In response, Humza Yousaf, the SNP MSP, accused Mr Miliband of being out of touch with Scotland. He described independence as the "broad, inclusive and positive option for Scotland, in which the wide range of identities we have in our modern nation – Scottish, English, British, Pakistani, Chinese, Polish, Irish and many, many more – can all be reflected and celebrated".
Mr Yousaf added: "What Mr Miliband desires for England can only be delivered by Scottish independence, giving both nations a new relationship based around a partnership of equals, bound by a social union of our shared history and culture."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article