THE exclusive proliferation of defence and intelligence agencies in England has created an imbalance in security decision making in the UK, according to academics.
The independence debate has highlighted a lack of political, academic and policy scrutiny of security in Scotland which must be addressed regardless of the outcome of the referendum, a team led by Edinburgh University security expert Dr Andrew Neal has found.
Dr Neal is convening seminars, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, to discuss the prospect of independence or the implications for continuing devolution with UK security policymakers currently encroaching on devolved areas.
First Minister Alex Salmond's ex-adviser on referendums Stephen Tierney, now advising the Scottish Parliament's Referendum Bill Committee, will contribute to the study.
Dr Neal said: "Security governance is already encroaching beyond the reserved matters of defence and foreign policy and becoming part of everyday governance at multiple levels of government.
"Currently there is no security think-tank network for Scottish policymakers as there is in London like the Royal United Services Institute or Chatham House.
"Academic security expertise exists across Scotland but has few links with the Scottish institutions of government.
"All of the UK's security services are based in England. All the UK Government centres of security policymaking are based in Westminster. All scrutiny and oversight bodies with an interest in security are based in London.
"The seminar series will invite policymakers, politicians, practitioners and academics from Scotland, the UK and comparator countries to address this imbalance."
The seminars,from September through to 2015, will explore the potentially different security priorities of Scotland and the UK and whether they can be separated in a highly integrated British Isles.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article