FRESH doubt has been cast on an independent Scotland being fast-tracked as a new member of the European Union after Mariano Rajoy, the Spanish Prime Minister, made clear it would "have to join the queue" of aspirant candidate countries.
There are currently five.
Mr Rajoy also suggested that if Scots voted for independence, the newly created independent state would be automatically thrown out of the EU and would need to apply for membership.
"This is a fact," he said. "It's neither a value judgment nor an opinion. If part of a country integrated into the EU leaves that country, then, logically, it would be outside the EU not because I say so but because that's what the treaties say."
The SNP Government argues that if Scots vote Yes next year, there would be a seamless transition towards the newly independent nation's full membership of the EU. Scotland, it says, would negotiate its way to EU membership from a position of strength because it would, by dint of still being part of the UK, continue to be part of the EU - so-called continuity of effect.
It is confident the 18-month period between a Yes vote in September and Independence Day in March 2016 would be a realistic timetable in securing full EU membership.
Last month after the Scottish Government published its White Paper, Mr Rajoy intervened in the independence debate when he said if a "region" opted to leave a member state, then it would "remain outside the EU".
A senior Brussels source has told The Herald that even if Scotland were fast-tracked it would take at least two years to join the EU.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article