REMAINING in the UK is the positive choice for Scotland, Michael Moore has insisted, rejecting the SNP argument that "to be more we must be less".
The Scottish Secretary in his keynote speech said there was a clear choice before Scots in September 2014 - whether to "go forward together" within the United Kingdom or "divert into the unknown" with independence.
He claimed Alex Salmond and the Nationalists were "in a bind" and would now say anything to achieve their goal of separation, accusing them of seeking votes "by stealth instead of candour" but insisting Scots would not be fooled.
Having recognised that most Scottish voters wanted to have the "best of both worlds" - a strong devolved Scottish Parliament with a strong voice at Westminster - the SNP was now arguing that under independence nothing much would change, said Mr Moore,
"So in the rush to get rid of the risks, they have changed their story on the key issues: on joining Nato; on membership of the EU and on the currency that an independent Scotland would use."
He pointed out how five years ago the SNP described the pound as a millstone around Scotland's neck but now was keen to keep it.
"Their plan to keep the pound devalues by the day. Yesterday, another independent report showed an independent Scotland using the pound would risk tax rises and higher borrowing costs. Like Harold Wilson, the SNP wants you to believe that the pound in your pocket would not be devalued but the stark truth is that it would cost you more."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article