THE Deputy First Minister has brushed off suggestions that SNP MSPs were unhappy with the performance of Alex Salmond in his televised debate with Alistair Darling.
Nicola Sturgeon also defended Mr Salmond's line on currency, under which an independent Scotland would enter into a currency union with the rest of the UK. Her intervention followed media claims that senior figures within the party were unhappy with their leader's performance on Tuesday night.
Defending Mr Salmond, Ms Sturgeon said: "We have made the rational case for a currency union and the arguments are absolutely solid, that this is best for Scotland and best for the rest of the UK."
Emphatically denying that there was disunity in the party in the wake of the televised debate, she said: "All of us in the SNP came into politics for Scotland to become a normal country in control of its own affairs. The mood in the party has never been better and belief is sky high. When we look at the polling after the debate, Alex Salmond winning over undecided voters and women voters was hugely encouraging.
"For those debates to be effective they must not be aimed at politicians and pundits but at ordinary voters."
Her comments came as the First Minister came under fresh pressure from leading economist Dr Angus Armstrong of the National Institute for Economic and Social Research, who warned an independent Scotland would struggle to bail out crisis-hit banks if it chose to use the pound without a formal currency-sharing deal with the remainder of the UK, a process known as sterlingisation.
Meanwhile, more than 200 celebrities and public figures have urged Scotland to stay part of the UK ahead of the country's historic vote on independence.
Sir Mick Jagger, Sir Bruce Forsyth, Dame Judi Dench, Simon Cowell and Professor Stephen Hawking are among the famous names to sign an open letter to "voters of Scotland" in the build-up to next month's referendum.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article