NICOLA Sturgeon is to outline the SNP's "democratic case" for independence by highlighting a range of Westminster policies consistently opposed by a majority of Scots MPs on all sides.
The Deputy First Minister will say today that the UK Government's so-called bedroom tax and plans to privatise the Royal Mail are examples of a "democratic gap". She will highlight infrastructure spending cuts, moves to replace the UK's nuclear deterrent and the Iraq war, saying all were opposed by most Scottish MPs.
Ms Sturgeon, who is responsible for the Government's referendum strategy, will tell an audience at Edinburgh University Scotland has had little influence on Westminster elections.
Speaking ahead of the event she said: "There are many flaws with the current Westminster system of government.
"However, the biggest problem with Scotland's current constitutional position – that majority Scottish opinion on issues that affect our everyday life can always be outvoted – cannot be dealt with through change at Westminster.
"Scotland now faces a choice of two futures. We can continue to make up less than one-tenth of the MPs in Parliament whose decisions on welfare, defence and the economy routinely disregard our wishes. Or we can become a truly equal partner through independence."
Ms Sturgeon will say in 34 of the last 68 years Scotland has been governed by parties that were elected to fewer than half of Scottish constituencies as further evidence of the "democratic gap".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article