What is happening in the SNP?
They are having a defence review and the leadership wants to change policy so that an independent Scotland would remain in Nato. The party's CND activists are meeting in Glasgow today.
What is Angus Robertson proposing?
An SNP Government will maintain Nato membership subject to an agreement that Scotland will not host nuclear weapons and Nato continues to respect the right of members to only take part in UN-sanctioned operations.
In the absence of such an agreement, Scotland will work with Nato as a member of the Partnership for Peace programme like Sweden, Finland, Austria and Ireland.
What does Jamie Hepburn's amendment say?
No change to current policy, which is to withdraw from Nato after independence.
What's the difference between Nato and Partnership for Peace?
Nato is a full-scale military alliance of 28 states, founded in 1949, and based on the concept of collective nuclear defence. Most EU countries are members, as are Norway and Iceland.
PfP is a Nato programme established in 1994 as a looser alliance, with each of the 22 member countries choosing the extent of its participation.
Why is this such a sensitive issue for the SNP?
Removing Trident is a touchstone for party activists and any reference to this at party conference is cheered to the rafters. Some fear that a U-turn on leaving Nato is a precursor to softening the line against nuclear weapons.
But isn't "healthy debate" a good thing at party conferences?
Up to a point, but no political leaders like courting defeat or looking as if their party is split.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article