THE pro-UK Better Together campaign must set out in detail what a No vote in the independence referendum would mean for Scotland, according to Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon.
The Scottish Government has provided a case for independence in its Scotland's Future White Paper, and Unionists must respond with a competing vision, Ms Sturgeon will say in a speech at St Andrews University today.
The speech has been described as the curtain-raiser to the 2014 independence campaign as the referendum approaches on September 18.
Speaking ahead of the St Andrews address, Ms Sturgeon said: "The referendum is not a choice between change and no change. It is about choosing the kind of change we want for Scotland and who we want to be in the driving seat of it - ourselves, or Westminster. It is a choice between two futures. That means the consequences of both a Yes vote and No vote need to be considered carefully. And that means both the Yes and the No campaigns have an obligation to inform.
"Those of us on the Yes side take that responsibility seriously. In November, the Scottish Government published the independence White Paper, Scotland's Future, setting out the practicalities and opportunities of what will happen if Scotland votes Yes.
"But to make an informed choice, you also need to know what a No vote will mean for Scotland. It is time for the No campaign to spell that out in detail to allow you to compare and contrast the competing visions for the future of Scotland and make your own minds up."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article