LORD Ashcroft, the Tory donor, has been accused by the SNP of committing a gaffe by conducting a poll that showed 50% of Scots did not want Trident retained in an independent Scotland while only 35% did.
The Nationalists said the Tory faced embarrassment because the poll was conducted to show "more than half of Scots are in favour of nuclear weapons" when they said the survey showed only 37% believed this in principle compared to 48% who did not.
"It in fact confirms Scottish opposition to nuclear weapons being based here," said Angus Robertson, the SNP defence spokesman. "Just 37% of Scots support the UK having nuclear weapons and even less, 35%, would want Trident to stay in Scotland after independence."
"Only a Yes vote next September can get rid of Trident for Scotland so that we can spend Scotland's share of this money helping to build a fairer society and stronger economy," he said.
When asked, in principle, where they stood on the UK retaining nuclear weapons, 37% of those polled said they were in support, 48% were opposed and 15% said they did not know.
Asked what should be done when Trident comes to the end of its life, 20% supported a like-for-like replacement, 31% a cheaper version, 34% scrapping it completely and 16% did not know.
When the £20 billion to £25bn replacement cost was included in the question, the respective figures were 24%, 29%, 36% and 11%.
Asked if Trident should continue to be based in Scotland, 43% said yes, 39% no and 18% did not know.
Asked if the UK's nuclear deterrent should be based in Scotland in the event of independence, 35% said yes, 50% said no and 15% did not know.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article