'No one is saying the night was a triumph," one of Alex Salmond's inner circle admitted with remarkable understatement after Tuesday's television debate with Alistair Darling.
"There were positives and negatives we'll be taking away from it," was added.
But behind the forced smiles in the Yes campaign, there is clearly a feeling that last week represented an opportunity missed.
The First Minister's performance was strong at the start of the 90-minute clash, as he cited the rise of food banks, Trident, and Scots not getting the governments they vote for, as examples of Westminster wrongs to be righted.
It was convincing too in the closing statement, as he lifted his gaze to the differences and opportunities possible with independence.
But in between those moments?
It was not just that he was criticised for his failure to state a Plan B on the currency if Westminster refused to go along with his plan to share the pound that struck observers.
It was that Salmond under-performed when he cross-examined Darling.
Not ad libbing, but working from a script, the First Minister wasted most of his allotted 12 minutes with questions about trivial and obscure statements from the No camp, including driving on the right and the threat of alien attack.
The intent, say the SNP, was to debunk the No side's arguments against independence by showing how ridiculous they often are.
But with 1.7 million people tuning in for information ahead of Scotland's biggest decision in 300 years, it struck the wrong note.
Instead of rising statesmanlike to the occasion, Salmond looked obsessed with scoring petty debating points rather than answering questions directly.
It might get him through a few quick rounds with Labour leader Johann Lamont each week, but it was no match for Darling on Tuesday.
It left many in the audience unhappy too, with Salmond being booed at one point.
One SNP insider said the problem, as previously diagnosed by former SNP deputy leader Jim Sillars, was that Salmond had surrounded himself with a team of Yes men and women who were not strong enough to highlight shortcomings.
Certainly the team he used for Tuesday - which included special advisers Geoff Aberdein and Stuart Nicolson, former MSPs Andrew Wilson and Duncan Hamilton, and the lifestyle coach Claire Howell - did not contain anyone who would intrude on the First Minister's comfort zone.
Senior figures in the Yes campaign this weekend conceded things would have to change.
So in future Salmond will focus on the uplifting aspects of independence, drawing on the sentiments he expressed in his opening and closing statements last week, and pushing the idea that by voting Yes people will be able to leave their mark on history.
At Better Together, they feel Tuesday's debate has given Darling a problem as well as a prize.
"Salmond will be much, much better in the next debate, we know that," says one No strategist.
But, overall, Unionists are not fazed, feeling that, while Darling can improve on his rocky moments, Salmond has an impossible task.
"Alistair can sharpen up his answer on the form of more devolution," said one Labour insider. "And he can sharpen up his answer on whether he agrees with David Cameron that Scotland can be a successful independent country.
"But Alex Salmond can't sharpen up his answer on the currency because he doesn't have one."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article