A vote to leave the European Union (EU) could secure the long-term future of free university education in Scotland, a former Labour government minister has said.
Tom Harris, a former MP who now heads the Vote Leave campaign in Scotland, said he wanted higher education institutions north of the border to be able to give Scots wanting to go to university "preferential treatment" when awarding places.
At the moment, European laws prevent that from happening, with universities required to treat applicants from Scotland and the rest of the EU equally.
Mr Harris, speaking at the launch of the Vote Leave campaign in Scotland, said: "I would much rather give preference to Scottish candidates and force people from anywhere out the UK to pay tuition fees. It's quite difficult to argue against that.
"If my kid applies to university and someone from Poland applies to the same course, we can't differentiate between those two applications, we can't say 'one's from Scotland, therefore we're going to give him preferential treatment', that's illegal.
"I actually think we should give Scots preferential treatment."
Mr Harris added statistics showed the number of Scottish students accepted to Aberdeen, Glasgow, Edinburgh and Dundee universities had fallen in the past two years while at the same time an increasing number of Europeans had been awarded places.
He said: "It doesn't have to be this way. EU law prevents universities from distinguishing between Scottish and EU students.
"EU students compete for the same places as Scottish students, meaning Scottish students often end up missing out on funded places at our universities.
"If the UK left the EU, Scotland would be free to set a new policy on EU applicants.
"They could be charged the same fees paid by other UK students, bolstering the finances of our universities, thereby securing free university tuition for Scottish students for the long-term."
Mr Harris also argued leaving the EU would make the Scottish Parliament more powerful, saying in the event of a Brexit vote Holyrood would take responsibility for policy in any areas that are not specifically designated as being reserved to Westminster under the Scotland Act.
Scotland would also be £1.5 billion better off, Mr Harris said, stating this is how much the country contributes to the amount the UK pays to Brussels each year.
He made the comments as Vote Leave launched its Scottish campaign at a visit to White House Products in Port Glasgow, Inverclyde, which manufactures hydraulic pumps.
The firm is owned by the Scottish chairman of the Business for Britain pressure group, Alistair MacMillan.
While polls have suggested a majority of Scots want to stay in Europe, Mr Harris said people were more open to switching their vote than they were in the 2014 independence referendum.
He said in that poll people "would go to their deaths without having changed their mind".
But he argued in this referendum, people were more willing to listen to the arguments.
The former Labour MP, who lost his seat at Westminster last year, predicted turn-out on June 23 will be lower than the 85% record high achieved in the independence vote, saying "people just don't feel as strongly".
John Edward, senior campaign spokesman for Scotland Stronger In Europe, said: "The reality is that university education is already free in Scotland and there is no prospect of that changing, so the Leave campaign's message in Scotland is entirely beside the point.
"The case to stay in Europe is positive and fact-based, demonstrating the gains of staying in Europe in terms of more jobs and lower prices.
"For every £1 we put into the EU we get almost £10 back through increased investment, trade, jobs, growth and lower prices.
"Under Brexit, people in Scotland would lose the positive influence of Europe as powers flowed mainly to the government at Westminster.
"The Leave campaign are unable to define what Brexit would look like, and therefore their claims are illusory."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel