ACADEMICS in Glasgow have developed a tool to help voters decide which party they should vote for in the Holyrood election.
Professor John Curtice and his team at Strathclyde University match answers to questions on a range of policies to statements and speeches of leaders from six parties standing in the election.
Voters are asked their preferences on 30 statements on key election topics.
The questions cover education, environment, Trident, the EU, policing, independence and devolution, refugees and immigration, employment, tax and spending, welfare and the NHS.
Respondents are asked if they completely agree, agree, neither agree or disagree disagree, completely disagree or no opinion.
For example the first question is “A group of parents should be able to set up a new school and have it funded by the government.”
The tool then calculates which party policy you are most in tune with giving a score for compatibility with the SNP, Labour, Conservatives, LibDems, Greens and Ukip.
Scores range from plus 100 to minus 100
A score of over 40 is strong level of agreement below 40 is weak and below zero is a negative match.
Professor Curtice, said: “During the next month of campaigning, voters will be presented with a myriad of policy announcements from the parties and multiple claims as why they should vote one way or the other.
“The Voter Guidance Tool is designed to help them sort through the mass of claim and counter-claim and ascertain in a matter of minutes how closely the policy positions of the parties match their own views.
“Of course, in the end voters will make up their own minds about which way to vote, and in so doing may well take into account considerations apart from the policy positions of the parties. But we hope that many will find this tool helpful in making a decision that will be crucial to Scotland’s future.”
The tool is available at www.scotvote16.com
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel