Nicola Sturgeon has been accused of attempting to "dodge scrutiny" of plans for a "divisive" second referendum on Scottish independence by bringing forward the Bill for such a vote when Holyrood is in recess.
The First Minister told the SNP conference in Glasgow last week that the Independence Referendum Bill is to be published for consultation at some point this week.
The announcement sparked an angry reaction from Scottish Labour leader Kezia Dugdale, who has now raised her concerns with Scottish Parliament Presiding Officer Ken Macintosh.
Read more: Low turnout in SNP deputy contest points to 'armchair activist' problem
Ms Dugdale argued that publishing the Bill when MSPs are not sitting is "not within the spirit" of the Ministerial Code, which states that "when the Parliament is meeting, ministers should ensure that important announcements of government policy are made, in the first instance, to the Parliament".
A spokesman for Finance and Constitution Secretary Derek Mackay branded it a "silly, incoherent attack" as plans for a Bill had already been announced by the First Minister in her programme for government.
Ms Dugdale said: "Making such an announcement during a short recess - when this was very clearly a long time in planning - is not within the spirit of these rules. Publishing the consultation in recess is only avoiding necessary Parliamentary scrutiny.
"Rather than focusing on the bread-and-butter issues, the SNP is pressing ahead with plans for a divisive second referendum and is trying to dodge scrutiny by publishing the consultation during parliamentary recess.
"That simply isn't good enough. Nicola Sturgeon must present her plans to the Scottish Parliament, not just to the party faithful at conference.
Read more: Low turnout in SNP deputy contest points to 'armchair activist' problem
"The First Minister promised voters in 2014 that the result would stand for a generation. She should keep that promise. Scottish Labour will vote against any Bill for a second referendum."
In her letter to the Presiding Officer, Ms Dugdale said she was "surprised" the First Minister had made the "very significant announcement" on the Bill's publication to conference instead of the Parliament.
"It also troubles me that the consultation itself will be published during recess, when MSPs will have no opportunity to question the First Minister on this announcement," she said.
"The question of a second independence referendum, particularly in light of the UK's decision to leave the European Union, is one that has attracted significant public discussion and is critical to the future of our country.
"It is not acceptable that MSPs will not have an opportunity to question the government on a plan of such significance, possibly for as much as a week after publication."
A spokesman for Mr Mackay said: "This is a silly, incoherent attack from an increasingly pointless Labour Party.
"The announcement that a referendum Bill would be published for consultation was already made to Parliament last month in our Programme for Government - and, of course, the whole point of having a public consultation is to enable proper scrutiny.
Read more: Low turnout in SNP deputy contest points to 'armchair activist' problem
"Every single part of Scotland voted to Remain in the EU but a Tory government with just one MP out of 59 here wants to drag us out of Europe - so rather than acting as the Tories' little helpers, Labour's time would be better spent working with the SNP to ensure all possible options are kept open to respect that vote."
A Scottish Parliament spokesman said: "The PO will respond to Kezia Dugdale at his earliest opportunity."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel