Brexit Minister Mike Russell has come under fire after the Scottish Government was given key papers on the impact of leaving the European Union on the "basis of secrecy".
Scottish Green co-convener Patrick Harvie said he was surprised SNP ministers had agreed to "withhold" the documents from both MSPs and the public, after being given them by the UK Government.
UK Brexit Secretary David Davis has already come under fire for failing to make the 850-page dossier, which contains details about the impact of leaving the EU on 58 different sectors of the economy, available to all MPs at Westminster.
Mr Davis was forced to release the information to the Brexit Select Committee following a House of Commons motion. The papers, which do not contain any sensitive information, have also been handed to the Lords EU committee and the devolved administrations.
Mr Russell confirmed to the Scottish Parliament's Finance and Constitution Committee the document had been handed over to the Scottish Government "on the understanding that we would not publish it."
He told MSPs: "I think in those circumstances certainly we are not going to publish it."
Mr Harvie questioned the decision to "accept that information from the Government on the basis of secrecy".
He told Mr Russell: "I am slightly disturbed by the implication of your decision to accept this information on the basis that you will withhold it from parliamentary scrutiny and from public scrutiny."
The Brexit Minister said he wanted the information to be made public - but stressed that was a matter for the UK Government, not ministers in Holyrood.
He said: "My inclination is to make everything I possibly can but on this occasion this is material that was provided to us and it was provided to the Committee in a confidential way.
"I think it should be public, I think it will become public, but I can't make an ex cathedra decision on that."
The Scottish Government confirmed it had received the impact assessment on Monday, but Mr Russell said there were concerns about "both the manner in which these reports have come to us, and their content".
He repeated calls for the papers to be made public in a letter to Mr Davis, which said: "It is essential that people across the UK fully understand the consequences of decisions being taken about their future.
"It is disappointing that the UK Government has persisted in keeping this information from being publicly available and have shared with us only on the basis that we do not release it into the public domain.
"I urge you to reconsider this approach, be up front with people and publish these reports immediately."
Mr Russell also complained the "reports do not contain any actual impact analysis".
The SNP Minister told Mr Davis: "They seem to be a collation of sectoral information, and as useful as that is it fails to address the key need; to understand what assessment the UK Government has made of the likely impact of its approach of leaving the Single Market and Customs Union and what mitigating measures if any are being put in place to manage negative impacts."
He also said to MSPs he recognised some of the material from information made available to the Joint Ministerial Committee, which brings together the UK Government and the devolved administrations to discuss Brexit.
"I think some of it is rehash of other material," Mr Russell said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel