NORTHERN IRELAND's Democratic Unionists have ruled out any formal Westminster deal with the SNP.
The staunchly anti-independence party's deputy leader Nigel Dodds said any pact with Scottish nationalists would be "bad for Northern Ireland and bad for the United Kingdom as a whole".
Mr Dodds' remarks came amid feverish speculation about how the DUP, which is forecast to win half of Northern Ireland's 18 Westminster seats, would use its weight in a hung parliament.
DUP leaders have previously said that the price for their support of either Labour or Conservative-led coalitions would be £1bn in extra spending for Northern Ireland.
However, Mr Dodds' intervention suggested his party would not back a Labour government supported formally by the SNP, which has, in turn, ruled out backing the Tories.
Mr Dodds, speaking on television, said: "We certainly would not be party to any kind of coalition or formal arrangement even short of a coalition which would involve the SNP which are out to break up the United Kingdom, wielding enormous influence over Ed Miliband and a Labour government.
"That would be something I think that would be bad for Northern Ireland, bad for the UK as a whole, because ultimately the SNP are about breaking up the UK, not furthering the interests of the UK."
The DUP has grown in to the dominant unionist force in Northern Ireland since it was founded by the late Ian Paisley in the early 1970s.
Mr Paisley, when First Minister of Northern Ireland, found common cause with his then Scottish counterpart Alex Salmond.
But his party, which backs a referendum on EU membership, had always been seen as a more natural ally for the Conservatives - and possibly UKIP - than Labour and the SNP.
Mr Dodds said he would not "negotiate publicly" what the party's position would be in the event of a hung parliament.
The DUP currently has eight seats but is widely predicted to take a ninth. Sinn Fein is forecast to retain its five Westminster seats but the Republican party's MPs historically do not attend parliament.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.Â
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.Â
That is invaluable.Â
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article