IN his first major speech as Scottish Labour leader, Jim Murphy brought the house down.
The applause was not for the benefit of the TV cameras - there was a feeling of buoyancy in the air that suggested the members of the party faithful who crammed into a small room in Glasgow's City Halls two days after his victory truly believed they had turned a corner.
He said it wouldn't be easy to beat the SNP, that it would take hard work, grit and pounding the pavements like never before. But they lapped up every word and perhaps for the first time in a long time, there was a determined confidence in the air - Labour were going to take on the SNP and they were going to win.
Just a week later, a reality check arrived in the form of a Survation poll, out yesterday. The first major survey carried out since Mr Murphy was elected leader, it showed Labour's support stagnant on 24 per cent in terms of voting intentions for May's general election. The SNP's, meanwhile, rose slightly to hit double that figure.
Murphy, with some justification, pointed out that he had only been in the job a week. His key message - that the party is desperate to change and the argument that a vote for the SNP is a vote to let David Cameron back in to Downing Street - will take time for voters to switch on to.
But what may be more worrying for Labour is are the findings on Murphy himself. Almost one in five voters (18 per cent) said his election made them less likely to back Labour, compared to 14 per cent who said it was more likely. It was a 'reverse honeymoon', as the SNP described it. According to polling expert John Curtice, the findings showed Murphy was no 'magic bullet' for the Labour cause.
It raised a question that had largely been dormant since that barnstorming first speech a week previously - how likely voters are to be turned off Labour by the new leader?
Neil Findlay's campaign believed that polarising nature of the frontrunner among party members could catapult the MSP to victory. They were wrong but the assessment of one insider - that "Genghis Khan was more left wing than Jim" - gives an indication of how he is viewed by some of his colleagues.
The SNP, meanwhile, believe that Murphy is unlikely to win back the 'red nats' - traditional Labour voters who backed independence - and therefore struggle to find mass appeal.
They add that what many saw as a coronation of Murphy meant that Labour has not had a serious debate about where it went wrong in the past.
His status as an MP, campaigning alongside the Tories during the referendum campaign, previous backing for the Iraq War and the renewal of Trident are all seen by the SNP lines of attack that will resonate with traditional Labour voters in the Westminster and 2016 Holyrood election campaigns.
Jim Murphy has overcome the odds before, not least by turning a safe Tory seat into a Labour stronghold before rising to the UK cabinet. His latest challenge is his most daunting yet.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article