LABOUR will today beef up its pitch on immigration by pledging to strengthen Britain's borders with 1,000 extra staff if it wins power next May.
In a keynote speech, Yvette Cooper, the Shadow Home Secretary, will say the £45 million cost of the additional personnel will be more than covered by imposing a new £10 charge on visitors from America and 55 other countries.
She will insist Labour will never engage in an "arms race of rhetoric" on immigration but will put forward practical and workable policies, that will make a difference.
Her remarks come just 48 hours before voters in Rochester and Strood in Kent go to the polls in a by-election, which is set to be won by Nigel Farage's Ukip, campaigning heavily on Europe and immigration.
Under Labour's proposals, nationals in countries enjoying a "visa waiver" system of fast-track permission to enter Britain will be hit with a charge of about £10 per visit, which the party insisted would more than cover the £45m cost of the extra staff.
This is a similar sum to the charges the US makes for its equivalent service. Labour pointed out tourism experts did not expect the new fee -to be paid by as many as 5.5m travellers a year, mostly Americans - would have any impact on the numbers choosing to come to Britain.
"Enforcement has got worse in the last five years," Ms Cooper will say in her speech. "Under [Home Secretary] Theresa May, basic checks are just not being done."
The Shadow Secretary of State will point to a "serious and growing problem" of immigrants taking increasingly desperate steps to get to the UK from Calais, including "awful cases of young men camping by the roadside, then leaping onto the wheel arches of passing lorries, only to be crushed and killed".
She will go on to say: "In a shouting match, sensible voices are sometimes not heard. That's why Labour needs to set out practical reforms as part of a sensible debate on the changes we need."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article