Tom Gordon
REBEL Labour councillors in Glasgow last night said they would defy a "heavy-handed" attempt to stop them discussing the future of city leader Gordon Matheson.
Around half the ruling Labour group have so far signed a motion demanding an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) on August 10 in order to oust Matheson.
The mutiny has been brewing since mid-June, when Matheson announced he was standing for the deputy leadership of Scottish Labour and would also run for Holyrood in 2016.
The move angered many of his colleagues, who want a leader focused on the 2017 council election, not one jumping ship to be an MSP.
Under pressure, Matheson agreed to stand down as leader next February, but that is still not soon enough for his critics, who want him out next month.
The feud last week prompted Scottish Labour general secretary Brian Roy to intervene.
In a note distributed by Matheson's chief whip, Cllr James Adams, Roy made it clear "this is not the way we in the Labour party should conduct our business".
There was also a threat that rebels "could face disciplinary action and ultimately suspension is possible".
Matheson's critics claim the move backfired and hardened the resolve for an EGM.
Senior councillors are now writing to Roy to challenge his view of the situation, pointing out that using a motion to call an EGM is entirely within the Labour group's standing orders.
The responses are also expected to insist Glasgow Labour needs a leader focused on the 2017 election, and a rapid timetable is needed to find a replacement.
One Labour rebel said: "This is not about Gordon. He might think it's about him, but it's not. This is about the group exercising their right to set their own timetable for the next leader."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article