DEFENCE chiefs have attempted to reassure Scottish shipbuilders after the head of the Royal Navy appeared to suggest a £4 billion contract for new warships may go abroad instead of to the Clyde.
The order for Type 26 frigates is considered crucial to shipbuilding in Scotland, and the future of the Clyde shipyards was a key part of the referendum campaign.
Last night sources close to Defence Secretary Michael Fallon were unequivocal the contract would not go abroad, saying: "UK warships are only built in UK yards. There will be no change in that."
A Ministry of Defence spokesman added that from 2015 the Clyde would be the UK's "only shipyard that builds complex warships".
Scottish Secretary Alistair Carmichael added: "The UK builds its warships within the UK, and always has done … The only damaging change for shipbuilding in Scotland would have come from independence."
But Angus Robertson, the SNP's defence spokesman, said comments by the First Sea Lord, Sir George Michael Zambellas, showed that voters had been lied to ahead of the referendum.
Labour's shadow defence minister Alison Seabeck also called on Mr Fallon to clarify the remarks by the head of the navy.
In an interview, Admiral Zambellas said the acquisition process for the frigates "looks for a solution to be able to give us what we need. The affordability question that comes from that depends on the best that industry can deliver".
He added : "You'll notice, I haven't necessarily said that that's the British industry, because the decision has not been made as to exactly what that solution to the requirement will be, and we wait to see what comes of it."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article