IT was an intriguing contrast proferred by the Liberal Democrats' Willie Rennie: Alex Salmond as Mr Bean or Alex Salmond as a pseudo Foreign Secretary.
The problem for Nicola Sturgeon and, indeed Angus Robertson, is how to deploy the "big beast" at Westminster. One loyal Nationalist colleague suggested the question answered itself. "Alex," he made clear, "will deploy himself."
That, of course, might be the problem for the party leadership.
There is, no doubt, a big upside to having such a formidable politician in your team. Mr Salmond, in his new role as the SNP's foreign affairs spokesman, will use his time on the green benches to, as he said, put forward a "pro Europe, pro developing world, against military adventurism" approach but, in so doing, seek to scare the living daylights out of the Conservative Right.
But there could also be a downside. As Mr Salmond's profile is raised and the media circus seeks its entertainment at his feet, the ex-First Minister might begin to let rip with colourful statements and accrue attention to create effectively an alternative powerbase to Ms Sturgeon and take the focus away from Mr Robertson in his bid to cut a more significant political figure now he has a party of 56 MPs to lead.
It was interesting to see that the first most people knew of Mr Salmond's appointment was not from the party leader but from the Gordon MP himself on Twitter.
Of course, it will be ironic that in the forthcoming referendum campaign Mr Salmond, in putting forward a pro Europe policy, will be joining forces and finding common cause with pro European Labourites, pro European Liberal Democrats and, even, dare I suggest, pro European Conservatives.
It bodes the question that in the Yes and No campaigns on the matter of EU membership, would the former party leader share a platform with his Europhile chums?
How times change as separatists become Unionists; in a European sense, that is.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article