NICOLA Sturgeon last night launched a cross-party appeal for the Chilcot Report into the conduct of the Iraq war to be made public ahead of the General Election.
The First Minister wrote to the leaders of all Holyrood parties asking them to present "a united stance in Scotland" and join her demand for the urgent release of the inquiry report. Its continued delay was "indefensible", she said.
Sir John Chilcot's inquiry into the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, the war and its aftermath was announced in 2009, and finished its hearings in February 2011.
The million-word report is believed to contain damning criticism of how then-Labour prime minister Tony Blair led the UK into the attack on Iraq alongside the US in 2003 on the false premise that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
The war saw the deaths of 179 UK service personnel and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians, and many believe it ramped up Islamist terror around the world.
The Chilcot Inquiry asked to publish material covering 200 Cabinet-level discussions and 25 notes between Blair and then-US president George W Bush, but met fierce resistance from both the US and UK governments.
Although the report was finished last year, its publication is now being held up to allow those criticised in it to respond to its contents.
The UK Government has said that unless it receives the final report by the end of February, it will delay publication until after May's election. An alliance of the SNP, Plaid Cymru, the LibDems and a handful of Tory and Labour backbench MPs is pressing for swift publication, and has secured a Commons debate on the issue for January 29.
Plaid's Westminster leader, Elfyn Llywd, accused Labour and the Tories of a "stitch-up" to avoid mutual embarrassment before the election - the former because they advocated the invasion, the latter because they supported it.
Sturgeon is now trying to add the authority of the Holyrood parties to the publication demand.
In her letter to her fellow leaders, she said: "The war fundamentally undermined trust in the UK system of government, and publication of Chilcot in the earliest possible course is surely essential in order that lessons can be learned ... and responsibility allocated.
"I believe the delay to be a scandal, and that we as political leaders in Scotland should stand together and issue a joint call for the publication of Chilcot prior to the General Election in May, which at this stage seems a more than reasonable timescale."
The move heaps pressure on Blairite Scottish Labour leader Jim Murphy, who voted for the war.
Murphy last night said the report should be published "soon" but stopped short of demanding its release before the election.
He said: "There is rightly real public interest in the findings of such an important inquiry and I think it is right that there is the earliest possible publication of the report."
Scottish LibDem leader Willie Rennie said: "We agree with Nicola Sturgeon. It is important that the lessons from Chilcot are learned while there are people involved in Parliament who are in a position to answer for their actions.
"Liberal Democrats are pushing for the Chilcot report to be published within one week of receipt - even if it is submitted within the purdah period."
SNP Westminster leader Angus Robertson added: "The publication of the Chilcot report is all the more important now that Labour in Scotland is led by a Westminster MP who voted for the Iraq war."
Scottish Green MSP Patrick Harvie said he expected to respond "positively" to the letter, but a spokesman for Tory leader Ruth Davidson said: "The First Minister should concentrate on issues she has responsibility over like health, education and justice - that's what the Scottish people expect from her."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article