REMOVING Scottish MPs from all House of Commons debates in the last 13 years would only have made a difference in 22 votes or 0.6 per cent of the total, research has found.
As so-called English Votes for English Laws is set to become a hot political topic in the forthcoming General Election - and with Commons Leader William Hague due to unveil the UK Government's Command Paper on the controversial issue as early as this week - the Commons Library has undertaken some research on the voting patterns of MPs and the geographic composition of governments.
It found:
*of the 18 governments since 1945, six have had a sufficient number of MPs in England to form a UK majority consisting of just English MPs - of these six government, two were Labour, three Conservative and one the current Coalition;
*among the 12 others, Winston Churchill (1951), Margaret Thatcher (1979) and Tony Blair (2001 and 2005) required the support of MPs from multiple constituent countries of the UK to form a majority in the Commons and
*of the 18 governments since 1945, 15 or 83 per cent had a majority among English MPs;
*the three governments, which did not, in 1950, 1964 and February 1974 were all Labour;
*of the 18 governments, 10 or 56% per cent had a majority in Scotland;
*the other eight or 44 per cent did not have a majority in Scotland - seven were Tory administrations and one the present Coalition.
The research also showed what impact there would have been if Scottish MPs had been removed from the records of historic Commons votes. Of approximately 3600 divisions between June 2001 and September 2014, just 22 or 0.6 per cent would have concluded differently had the votes of Scottish MPs not been counted.
These included the Bill to reform the House of Lords in 2003, which MPs from the rest of the UK would have passed, the Higher Education Bill of 2004 bringing in tuition fees, which would have been lost, and, more recently in August 2013, the vote on taking military action against Syria, would have succeeded.
In 2006/7, of all the 221 votes cast, the absence of Scottish MPs would have made a difference to not a single one.
In each of six sessions between 2001 and 2014, including the Coalition's first in 2010 to 2012 when there were a massive 544 votes, not having Scottish MPs vote would have made a difference to the outcome of just one.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article