COUNCILS are facing such deep spending cuts their future role must be reassessed, a leading think tank has warned.
Economist Jo Armstrong, co-director of Fiscal Affairs Scotland called for an "honest and inclusive debate" about the services local authorities should be expected to provide.
She said councils were unlikely to be able to go on delivering key services, faced with a 10 per cent cut in funding from Scottish Government since 2009.
A new study by the think tank yesterday raised fresh fears about council cuts.
It warned local authorities would axe services they are not legally obliged to provide and increase costs for other services.
It said: "Seeking to charge service users more may be one option to help fill any funding gap.
"What seems more likely, is that non-statutory services will be at even greater risk than now, as will service quality levels that are deemed to be over and above the minimum necessary."
The study found that while Scottish Government spending on health has remained stable as a proportion of the overall Scottish budget since devolution, at 33 per cent, councils have received a smaller share, falling from 35 per cent to 29 per cent.
Ms Armstrong said: "As budgets continue to tighten, while demand continues to rise, it is increasingly hard to see how the continued delivery of many of Scotland's key public services can be achieved by local authorities securing additional efficiency savings alone.
"At a time of impending elections and the implementation of new tax and spending arrangements across the UK, there is a real need for an honest and inclusive debate on the future role of local government; just what is it we expect local authorities to deliver and how should funding for those chosen services be raised?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article