Alex Salmond has attacked the "pathetic" debate about Scottish devolution at Westminster as he again raised the prospect of another independence referendum.
He accused Conservative backbenchers in the Commons of hijacking talks over more powers for Scotland by seeking to link them to English votes for English laws and head off the threat of Ukip.
And he accused Prime Minister David Cameron of deliberately shattering the pre-referendum cross-party consensus on more powers for Scotland.
In his first major speech since he announced he was stepping down as First Minister, Mr Salmond said unionists "have some explaining to do" after the stock market fell by 6% in the wake of the No vote in the referendum.
He also linked the record fall in Scottish unemployment, announced today, to the independence referendum, insisting "the process of political change makes the economy better".
Speaking at an STUC conference on jobs in Glasgow, he said Scotland will never be the same again after the referendum, "it will be better".
He added: "Next time, and next time there shall be, it will get better yet."
Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, who was confirmed today as Mr Salmond's heir apparent as SNP leader and First Minister, has pledged to engage constructively with the cross-party Smith Commission on Scottish devolution, but said her ambition of Scottish independence remains undiminished by the No vote.
Mr Salmond said: "The referendum process offers real hope in leading to a better society in Scotland.
"We need to keep that energy in the civic and political life of this country, but we also need to keep it in our economic life.
"Scotland will never be the same again, it will be better. Next time, and next time there shall be, it will get better yet."
He added: "They said the referendum process would stop people hiring in Scotland.
"Actually, having the referendum saw the biggest fall in unemployment in Scottish history in the weeks leading up to the vote.
"That demonstrates that the process of political change makes the economy better."
He continued: "The voices of doom who greeted every bump in the night of the stock market as if it were a national emergency have a great deal of explaining to do.
"Since the No vote the stock market has collapsed by more than 6%. Over £100 billion has been wiped off the value of shares.
"Has this been linked to the No vote in the referendum? Probably not.
"But if there had been a Yes vote the same voices would have been telling us something absolutely different."
He said all Scottish taxes should be raised and spent in Scotland, with a proportion going to Westminster for reserved functions such as foreign affairs, defence and the Bank of England.
But he accused Mr Cameron of deliberately hampering the devolution process by saying "change in Scotland would be in tandem - at the same pace - as change elsewhere".
Mr Salmond said: "In that sentence he shattered the joint unionist platform, and of course he did so deliberately.
"He wasn't being unstatesmanlike, as Gordon Brown suggested, he was acting as Tory prime ministers do. It is in the nature of the beast."
A debate at Westminster yesterday on devolution was dominated by MPs seeking English votes for English laws.
Mr Salmond said: "I think 'pathetic' would be the single word for it.
"The first part of it was totally dominated not by 'What are we going to do about Scotland?', or how the leaders of the three Westminster parties - the three amigos - were going to keep the vow they made to Scotland for substantial further change when none of them even bothered to turn up.
"Instead it was about English Conservative backbenchers saying 'What's in it for England?'."
He added: "I'm actually sympathetic to the idea that England should elect its own MPs and decide its own domestic policy.
"But what I'm not sympathetic to is the charade of Westminster, where a debate about the future of Scotland and redeeming a vow to the Scottish people is hijacked by English Conservative backbenchers."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article