Permitting retired Lords to entertain business contacts in Westminster's taxpayer-subsidised bars and restaurants will mean "the festive season never ends for peers", the SNP has complained.
Proposed reforms designed as an incentive to encourage peers to retire would permit them to continue to use the numerous restaurants and bars at Westminster.
The SNP - whose long-standing position is not to take peerages - fears the leave to permit retired peers to continue to entertain clients and business contacts at Westminster will "open Parliament up to further potential of sleaze with a total lack of accountability".
SNP MP Angus MacNeil said: "At a time when many people across Scotland are struggling to make ends meet, proposals to allow retired peers to continue to use lavish Lords facilities at taxpayers' expense take the biscuit. It seems the festive season never ends for peers.
"Earlier this year, I wrote to the Metropolitan Police urging them to review new evidence about cash-for-peerage deals admitted by Liberal Democrat party treasurer Lord Razzall. But it seems that just as we get to grips with one scandal, another emerges.
"At Westminster, we already have the ludicrous situation that there are far more legislators who are appointed than elected.
"It beggars belief that in 2014 we still have a system of unelected peers claiming up to £300 a day just to clock in.
"The SNP's long-standing position is that we believe those making laws should be elected by the people, and therefore we do not nominate members to the House of Lords.
"With Tory austerity set to continue as at least £25 billion more in cuts heads Scotland's way, it is time for the Westminster parties to review this ludicrous proposal."
ends
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article